Sun Dye Chem Madras High Court
Madras HC in the case of M/s. Sun Dye Chem Versus The Assistant Commissioner Nov 09, 2020 by ConsultEase Administrator in Madras High Court 2020 Table of Contents Case Covered: Facts of the Case: Observations: The decision of the Court: Read & Download the full Decision in pdf. (2020) taxcode.in 46 HC IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS Sun Dye Chem v.
The Assistant Commissioner (ST) and Anr. W.P. No.
Angry Sun - Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
29676 of 2019 Decided on 06-Oct-20 Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth Add. Info: For Appellant (s): Mr.
K. Thyagarajan. For Respondent (s): Mrs.
Inti-Sun God Preview by skywarp-2 on DeviantArt
G. Dhana Madhiri, Government Advocate. Share Link Madras High Court M/S.Sun Dye Chem vs The Assistant Commissioner (St) on 6 October, 2020.
The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of M/s. Sun Dye Chem v. The Assistant Commissioner [W.P.
Category:Photos of the Sun by STEREO - Wikimedia Commons
No. 29676 of 2019 dated November 6, 2020] has held that absence of enabling provision cannot jeopardize taxpayer from availing credit that they are entitled to, while allowing them to rectify and correct Form GSTR. Case Title Sun Dye Chem VS The Assistant Commissioner Court Madras High Court Honorable Judges Justice Anita Sumanth Citation 2020 (10) GSTPanacea 73 HC Madras W.P.
No. 29676 Of 2019 Judgement Date 06-October-2020 The petitioner, a partnership firm registered under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, regularly files returns reflecting its turnover []. Sun Dye Chem vs.
The Assistant Commissioner (St), The Commissioner Of State Tax (Madras High Court, Tamilnadu) Petitioner / Applicant Sun Dye Chem Respondent. Get free access to the complete judgment in M/s. SUN DYE CHEM, R v.
The Assistant Commis on CaseMine. SUN DYE CHEM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST), THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX [High-Court]ORDER The petitioner is a partnership firm, a registered dealer in terms of the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (in short 'Act').
Regular returns of turnover are being filed computing the tax payable after setting off Input Tax Credit (ITC) as against the output tax. Court: Madras High Court Brief: The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of M/s. Sun Dye Chem v.
The Assistant Commissioner [W.P. No. 29676 of 2019 dated November 6, 2020] has held that absence of enabling provision cannot jeopardize taxpayer from availing credit that they are entitled to, while allowing them to rectify and correct Form GSTR.
Sun Dye Chem Vs. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) and Anr. - Madras High Court October 6, 2020 / 16 minutes of reading.
