Although unpredictable in their occurrence, the size, shape, and position of these characteristics have a low probability of recurrence in the same manner on a different shoe. Thus, combined with class characteristics, even one identifying characteristic is extremely powerful evidence to support a conclusion of identification. How It's Done Evidence that May be Examined Footwear and tire tracks can be deposited on almost any surface, from paper to the human body.
Prints are divided into three types: visible, plastic and latent. A visible print is a transfer of material from the shoe or tire to the surface. This type can be seen by the naked eye without additional aids.
For example, bloody shoe prints left on. CLASS CHARACTERISTICS Class characteristics are features of an item of evidence that can be used to include or exclude it from a group. These characteristics for shoeprint impressions include the shape, size, and design.
For example, there are many size 10 Nike Air Jordans made with the same outsole (tread) pattern. If we find this pattern at a crime scene, any suspect shoe with these same. As shoes and tires are such as nicks, cuts, and wear patterns develop.
a suitable show up in prints and impressions and can be compared with shoes or tires. a suspect's ' combination of tracking and footwear impressions, it events leading up to, those occurring during, crime. Collection of evidence.
The tasks for the forensic footwear examiner are: (i) identi cation of class characteristics by comparing the evidence against a possibly large set of knowns to determine generic footwear brand, gender and size, and (ii) individualization of a known print as having been source of the evidence. Forensic footwear evidence can be used in legal proceedings to help prove that a shoe was at a crime scene. Footwear evidence is often the most abundant form of evidence at a crime scene and in some cases can prove to be as specific as a fingerprint.
Initially investigators will look to identify the make and model of the shoe or trainer which made an impression. This can be done visually or by. Footwear impressions as forensic evidence: The screening of footwear impression evidence involves examination, and subsequent comparison, of class and individual characteristics conflated therein.
Class characteristics are a fallout of the manufacturing process. These include the physical size and design of the footwear. In the course of a shoe print examination, these variables are considered independently for each defect and then in combination with all the other defects.
These individual characteristics, along with the class characteristics, enable The an examiner to determine the identity or nonidentity of a shoe print when compared with similar characteristics on a suspect shoe. Existing Approach. These are the identifying characteristics of shoe impressions, and examiners look for these irregularities in the crime scene impressions to come to a conclusion.
In forensics, a shoe that investigators think could have caused the print (let's call it the suspect's shoe) is studied for its class, subclass, and randomly acquired characteristics. "The Significance of Class Association of Footwear Evidence" presented at the NIJ Trace Symposium, August 2009, Clearwater FL - determine the likelihood that 2 people have shoe similar in tread design, size and wear.